|
Williams |
Following up the
surprising clews thus suggested, Sir Norman Lockyer, of London, has in
recent years elaborated what is perhaps the most comprehensive cosmogonic
guess that has ever been attempted. His theory, known as the "meteoric
hypothesis," probably bears the same relation to the speculative thought
of our time that the nebular hypothesis of Laplace bore to that of the
eighteenth century. Outlined in a few words, it is an attempt to explain
all the major phenomena of the universe as due, directly or indirectly,
to the gravitational impact of such meteoric particles, or specks of cosmic
dust, as comets are composed of. Nebulae are vast cometary clouds, with
particles more or less widely separated, giving off gases through meteoric
collisions, internal or external, and perhaps glowing also with electrical
or phosphorescent light. Gravity eventually brings the nebular particles
into closer aggregations, and increased collisions finally vaporize the
entire mass, forming planetary nebulae and gaseous stars. Continued condensation
may make the stellar mass hotter and more luminous for a time, but eventually
leads to its liquefaction, and ultimate consolidation - the aforetime nebulae
becoming in the end a dark or planetary star.
The exact correlation which Lockyer attempts
to point out between successive stages of meteoric condensation and the
various types of observed stellar bodies does not meet with unanimous acceptance.
Mr. Ranyard, for example, suggests that the visible nebulae may not be
nascent stars, but emanations from stars, and that the true pre-stellar
nebulae are invisible until condensed to stellar proportions. But such
details aside, the broad general hypothesis that all the bodies of the
universe are, so to speak, of a single species - that nebulae (including
comets), stars of all types, and planets, are but varying stages in the
life history of a single race or type of cosmic organisms - is accepted
by the dominant thought of our time as having the highest warrant of scientific
probability.
All this, clearly, is but an amplification
of that nebular hypothesis which, long before the spectroscope gave us
warrant to accurately judge our sidereal neighbors, had boldly imagined
the development of stars out of nebulae and of planets out of stars. But
Lockyer's hypothesis does not stop with this. Having traced the developmental
process from the nebular to the dark star, it sees no cause to abandon
this dark star to its fate by assuming, as the original speculation assumed,
that this is a culminating and final stage of cosmic existence. For the
dark star, though its molecular activities have come to relative stability
and impotence, still retains the enormous potentialities of molar motion;
and clearly, where motion is, stasis is not. Sooner or later, in its ceaseless
flight through space, the dark star must collide with some other stellar
body, as Dr. Croll imagines of the dark bodies which his "pre-nebular theory"
postulates. Such collision may be long delayed; the dark star may be drawn
in comet-like circuit about thousands of other stellar masses, and be hurtled
on thousands of diverse parabolic or elliptical orbits, before it chances
to collide - but that matters not: "billions are the units in the arithmetic
of eternity," and sooner or later, we can hardly doubt, a collision must
occur. Then without question the mutual impact must shatter both colliding
bodies into vapor, or vapor combined with meteoric fragments; in short,
into a veritable nebula, the matrix of future worlds. Thus the dark star,
which is the last term of one series of cosmic changes, becomes the first
term of another series - at once a post-nebular and a pre-nebular condition;
and the nebular hypothesis, thus amplified, ceases to be a mere linear
scale, and is rounded out to connote an unending series of cosmic cycles,
more nearly satisfying the imagination.
In this extended view, nebulae and luminous
stars are but the infantile and adolescent stages of the life history of
the cosmic individual; the dark star, its adult stage, or time of true
virility. Or we may think of the shrunken dark star as the germ-cell, the
pollen-grain, of the cosmic organism. Reduced in size, as becomes a germ-cell,
to a mere fraction of the nebular body from which it sprang, it yet retains
within its seemingly non- vital body all the potentialities of the original
organism, and requires only to blend with a fellow-cell to bring a new
generation into being. Thus may the cosmic race, whose aggregate census
makes up the stellar universe, be perpetuated - individual solar systems,
such as ours, being born, and growing old, and dying to live again in their
descendants, while the universe as a whole maintains its unified integrity
throughout all these internal mutations - passing on, it may be, by infinitesimal
stages, to a culmination hopelessly beyond human comprehension. |
|