|
Williams |
In the closing
years of his life Galileo took into his family, as his adopted disciple
in science, a young man, Evangelista Torricelli (1608-1647), who proved
himself, during his short lifetime, to be a worthy follower of his great
master. Not only worthy on account of his great scientific discoveries,
but grateful as well, for when he had made the great discovery that the
"suction" made by a vacuum was really nothing but air pressure, and not
suction at all, he regretted that so important a step in science might
not have been made by his great teacher, Galileo, instead of by himself.
"This generosity of Torricelli," says Playfair, "was, perhaps, rarer than
his genius: there are more who might have discovered the suspension of
mercury in the barometer than who would have been willing to part with
the honor of the discovery to a master or a friend."
Torricelli's discovery was made in 1643,
less than two years after the death of his master. Galileo had observed
that water will not rise in an exhausted tube, such as a pump, to a height
greater than thirty-three feet, but he was never able to offer a satisfactory
explanation of the principle. Torricelli was able to demonstrate that the
height at which the water stood depended upon nothing but its weight as
compared with the weight of air. If this be true, it is evident that any
fluid will be supported at a definite height, according to its relative
weight as compared with air. Thus mercury, which is about thirteen times
more dense than water, should only rise to one-thirteenth the height of
a column of water - that is, about thirty inches. Reasoning in this way,
Torricelli proceeded to prove that his theory was correct. Filling a long
tube, closed at one end, with mercury, he inverted the tube with its open
orifice in a vessel of mercury. The column of mercury fell at once, but
at a height of about thirty inches it stopped and remained stationary,
the pressure of the air on the mercury in the vessel maintaining it at
that height. This discovery was a shattering blow to the old theory that
had dominated that field of physics for so many centuries. It was completely
revolutionary to prove that, instead of a mysterious something within the
tube being responsible for the suspension of liquids at certain heights,
it was simply the ordinary atmospheric pressure mysterious enough, it is
true - pushing upon them from without. The pressure exerted by the atmosphere
was but little understood at that time, but Torricelli's discovery aided
materially in solving the mystery. The whole class of similar phenomena
of air pressure, which had been held in the trammel of long-established
but false doctrines, was now reduced to one simple law, and the door to
a solution of a host of unsolved problems thrown open.
It had long been suspected and believed
that the density of the atmosphere varies at certain times. That the air
is sometimes "heavy" and at other times "light" is apparent to the senses
without scientific apparatus for demonstration. It is evident, then, that
Torricelli's column of mercury should rise and fall just in proportion
to the lightness or heaviness of the air. A short series of observations
proved that it did so, and with those observations went naturally the observations
as to changes in the weather. It was only necessary, therefore, to scratch
a scale on the glass tube, indicating relative atmospheric pressures, and
the Torricellian barometer was complete.
Such a revolutionary theory and such an
important discovery were, of course, not to be accepted without controversy,
but the feeble arguments of the opponents showed how untenable the old
theory had become. In 1648 Pascal suggested that if the theory of the pressure
of air upon the mercury was correct, it could be demonstrated by ascending
a mountain with the mercury tube. As the air was known to get progressively
lighter from base to summit, the height of the column should be progressively
lessened as the ascent was made, and increase again on the descent into
the denser air. The experiment was made on the mountain called the Puy-de-Dome,
in Auvergne ,
and the column of mercury fell and rose progressively through a space of
about three inches as the ascent and descent were made.
This experiment practically sealed the
verdict on the new theory, but it also suggested something more. If the
mercury descended to a certain mark on the scale on a mountain-top whose
height was known, why was not this a means of measuring the heights of
all other elevations? And so the beginning was made which, with certain
modifications and corrections in details, is now the basis of barometrical
measurements of heights.
In hydraulics, also, Torricelli seems to
have taken one of the first steps. He did this by showing that the water
which issues from a hole in the side or bottom of a vessel does so at the
same velocity as that which a body would acquire by falling from the level
of the surface of the water to that of the orifice. This discovery was
of the greatest importance to a correct understanding of the science of
the motions of fluids. He also discovered the valuable mechanical principle
that if any number of bodies be connected so that by their motion there
is neither ascent nor descent of their centre of gravity, these bodies
are in equilibrium.
Besides making these discoveries, he greatly
improved the microscope and the telescope, and invented a simple microscope
made of a globule of glass. In 1644 he published a tract on the properties
of the cycloid in which he suggested a solution of the problem of its quadrature.
As soon as this pamphlet appeared its author was accused by Gilles Roberval
(1602-1675) of having appropriated a solution already offered by him. This
led to a long debate, during which Torricelli was seized with a fever,
from the effects of which he died, in Florence, October 25, 1647. There
is reason to believe, however, that while Roberval's discovery was made
before Torricelli's, the latter reached his conclusions independently. |
|