|
Williams |
We have previously
referred to the influence of the Byzantine civilization in transmitting
the learning of antiquity across the abysm of the dark age. It must be
admitted, however, that the importance of that civilization did not extend
much beyond the task of the common carrier. There were no great creative
scientists in the later Roman empire of the East any more than in the corresponding
empire of the West. There was, however, one field in which the Byzantine
made respectable progress and regarding which their efforts require a few
words of special comment. This was the field of medicine.
The Byzantines of this time could boast
of two great medical men, Aetius of Amida (about 502-575 A.D.) and Paul
of Aegina (about 620-690). The works of Aetius were of value largely because
they recorded the teachings of many of his eminent predecessors, but he
was not entirely lacking in originality, and was perhaps the first physician
to mention diphtheria, with an allusion to some observations of the paralysis
of the palate which sometimes follows this disease.
Paul of Aegina, who came from the Alexandrian
school about a century later, was one of those remarkable men whose ideas
are centuries ahead of their time. This was particularly true of Paul in
regard to surgery, and his attitude towards the supernatural in the causation
and treatment of diseases. He was essentially a surgeon, being particularly
familiar with military surgery, and some of his descriptions of complicated
and difficult operations have been little improved upon even in modern
times. In his books he describes such operations as the removal of foreign
bodies from the nose, ear, and esophagus; and he recognizes foreign growths
such as polypi in the air-passages, and gives the method of their removal.
Such operations as tracheotomy, tonsellotomy, bronchotomy, staphylotomy,
etc., were performed by him, and he even advocated and described puncture
of the abdominal cavity, giving careful directions as to the location in
which such punctures should be made. He advocated amputation of the breast
for the cure of cancer, and described extirpation of the uterus. Just how
successful this last operation may have been as performed by him does not
appear; but he would hardly have recommended it if it had not been sometimes,
at least, successful. That he mentions it at all, however, is significant,
as this difficult operation is considered one of the great triumphs of
modern surgery.
But Paul of Aegina is a striking exception
to the rule among Byzantine surgeons, and as he was their greatest, so
he was also their last important surgeon. The energies of all Byzantium
were so expended in religious controversies that medicine, like the other
sciences, was soon relegated to a place among the other superstitions,
and the influence of the Byzantine school was presently replaced by that
of the conquering Arabians. |
|