|
Williams |
We are entering
now upon the most important scientific epoch of antiquity. When Aristotle
and Theophrastus passed from the scene, Athens ceased to be in any sense
the scientific centre of the world. That city still retained its reminiscent
glory, and cannot be ignored in the history of culture, but no great scientific
leader was ever again to be born or to take up his permanent abode within
the confines of Greece proper. With almost cataclysmic suddenness, a new
intellectual centre appeared on the south shore of the Mediterranean. This
was the city of Alexandria, a city which Alexander the Great had founded
during his brief visit to Egypt, and which became the capital of Ptolemy
Soter when he chose Egypt as his portion of the dismembered empire of the
great Macedonian. Ptolemy had been with his master in the East, and was
with him in Babylonia when he died. He had therefore come personally in
contact with Babylonian civilization, and we cannot doubt that this had
a most important influence upon his life, and through him upon the new
civilization of the West. In point of culture, Alexandria must be regarded
as the successor of Babylon, scarcely less directly than of Greece. Following
the Babylonian model, Ptolemy erected a great museum and began collecting
a library. Before his death it was said that he had collected no fewer
than two hundred thousand manuscripts. He had gathered also a company of
great teachers and founded a school of science which, as has just been
said, made Alexandria the culture-centre of the world.
Athens in the day of her prime had known
nothing quite like this. Such private citizens as Aristotle are known to
have had libraries, but there were no great public collections of books
in Athens, or in any other part of the Greek domain, until Ptolemy founded
his famous library. As is well known, such libraries had existed in Babylonia
for thousands of years. The character which the Ptolemaic epoch took on
was no doubt due to Babylonian influence, but quite as much to the personal
experience of Ptolemy himself as an explorer in the Far East. The marvellous
conquering journey of Alexander had enormously widened the horizon of the
Greek geographer, and stimulated the imagination of all ranks of the people,
It was but natural, then, that geography and its parent science astronomy
should occupy the attention of the best minds in this succeeding epoch.
In point of fact, such a company of star-gazers and earth-measurers came
upon the scene in this third century B.C. as had never before existed anywhere
in the world. The whole trend of the time was towards mechanics. It was
as if the greatest thinkers had squarely faced about from the attitude
of the mystical philosophers of the preceding century, and had set themselves
the task of solving all the mechanical riddles of the universe, They no
longer troubled themselves about problems of "being" and "becoming"; they
gave but little heed to metaphysical subtleties; they demanded that their
thoughts should be gauged by objective realities. Hence there arose a succession
of great geometers, and their conceptions were applied to the construction
of new mechanical contrivances on the one hand, and to the elaboration
of theories of sidereal mechanics on the other.
The wonderful company of men who performed
the feats that are about to be recorded did not all find their home in
Alexandria, to be sure; but they all came more or less under the Alexandrian
influence. We shall see that there are two other important centres; one
out in Sicily, almost at the confines of the Greek territory in the west;
the other in Asia Minor, notably on the island of Samos - the island which,
it will be recalled, was at an earlier day the birthplace of Pythagoras.
But whereas in the previous century colonists from the confines of the
civilized world came to Athens, now all eyes turned towards Alexandria,
and so improved were the facilities for communication that no doubt the
discoveries of one coterie of workers were known to all the others much
more quickly than had ever been possible before. We learn, for example,
that the studies of Aristarchus of Samos were definitely known to Archimedes
of Syracuse, out in Sicily. Indeed, as we shall see, it is through a chance
reference preserved in one of the writings of Archimedes that one of the
most important speculations of Aristarchus is made known to us. This illustrates
sufficiently the intercommunication through which the thought of the Alexandrian
epoch was brought into a single channel. We no longer, as in the day of
the earlier schools of Greek philosophy, have isolated groups of thinkers.
The scientific drama is now played out upon a single stage; and if we pass,
as we shall in the present chapter, from Alexandria to Syracuse and from
Syracuse to Samos, the shift of scenes does no violence to the dramatic
unities.
Notwithstanding the number of great workers
who were not properly Alexandrians, none the less the epoch is with propriety
termed Alexandrian. Not merely in the third century B.C., but throughout
the lapse of at least four succeeding centuries, the city of Alexander
and the Ptolemies continued to hold its place as the undisputed culture-centre
of the world. During that period Rome rose to its pinnacle of glory and
began to decline, without ever challenging the intellectual supremacy of
the Egyptian city. We shall see, in a later chapter, that the Alexandrian
influences were passed on to the Mohammedan conquerors, and every one is
aware that when Alexandria was finally overthrown its place was taken by
another Greek city, Byzantium or Constantinople .
But that transfer did not occur until Alexandria had enjoyed a longer period
of supremacy as an intellectual centre than had perhaps ever before been
granted to any city, with the possible exception of Babylon. |
|